econworks

econworks

Share this post

econworks
econworks
Compensating Marginal Cost Reduction

Compensating Marginal Cost Reduction

Analytics

econworks's avatar
econworks
Mar 04, 2025
∙ Paid

Share this post

econworks
econworks
Compensating Marginal Cost Reduction
Share

In a previous case study, we examined how the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) successfully prevented the proposed acquisition of Albertsons Companies, Inc. by the Kroger Company. During the litigation, the FTC's economic expert utilized an analysis known as compensating marginal cost reduction (CMCR) analysis to demonstrate that the efficiencies gained through marginal cost reductions from the proposed transaction would not compensate for any potential price increases. The defendant's economic expert argued that the CMCR analysis was somewhat limited due to inaccurate input, which differed from the estimates provided by the defendant's own economic expert. Ultimately, the court affirmed the findings of the plaintiff's economic expert.

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to econworks to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 econworks
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share