During a merger, competition authorities and the parties involved may not fully grasp the economic principles underpinning each other's viewpoints. To mitigate potential misunderstandings, economists from both sides can hold meetings to discuss technical economic details. Furthermore, courts may also look to understand the economic factors at play. The case of FTC v. Amazon offers a unique opportunity to witness a meeting between the economists from both parties, based exclusively on publicly available information. This brief will summarize the questions raised by economists from both the FTC and Amazon, offering deeper insights into the ongoing litigation.
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to econworks to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.