econworks

econworks

Share this post

econworks
econworks
FTC v Edwards: Defendants’ Response

FTC v Edwards: Defendants’ Response

Case Study

econworks's avatar
econworks
Aug 21, 2025
∙ Paid

Share this post

econworks
econworks
FTC v Edwards: Defendants’ Response
Share

In a previous blog, we examined the complaint that the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) filed to prevent Edwards Lifesciences Corp. (Edwards) from merging with JenaValve Technology, Inc. The FTC primarily expressed concerns about competition, stating that the acquisition could eliminate direct competition and that the merger could result in a notable decrease in competition, potentially leading to reduced innovation, lower product quality, and an increase in prices within the market for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) devices designed for aortic regurgitation (AR).

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to econworks to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 econworks
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share