econworks

econworks

Share this post

econworks
econworks
FTC v Southern Glazer and FTC v Pepsi: Price Discrimination

FTC v Southern Glazer and FTC v Pepsi: Price Discrimination

Case Study

econworks's avatar
econworks
Jul 23, 2025
∙ Paid

Share this post

econworks
econworks
FTC v Southern Glazer and FTC v Pepsi: Price Discrimination
Share

In December 2024, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) filed a complaint against Southern Galzer’s Wine and Spirits, LLC (“Southern”) for violating the Robinson-Patman Act. In January 2025, the FTC also filed a complaint against Pepsico, Inc. (Pepsi) for the same violation. However, on May 22, 2025, the FTC dismissed the complaint against Pepsico. Both complaints highlight instances of price discrimination, which may violate U.S. laws. This sequence of events offers a compelling case study on the nature of these complaints.

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to econworks to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 econworks
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share