The $885 Million Question: Actavis and the Circularity Problem
The Fatal Flaw in *Actavis* (Exposed by Takeda)
In 30 Seconds
The Supreme Court in FTC v. Actavis held that large payments signal weak patents
But to determine whether a payment is “large,” courts must already know patent strength
That creates a circular liability test with no accepted methodology
In Takeda, the jury resolved this gap by selecting a but-for entry date from competing scenarios
The result: …



